So, this is the an attempt to enter the world of so called weblogging.

I think it is a well known fact of journalism not to write about thing that are not interesting, or non-news. Kind of like how Harald Bohr though of the wastebasket as being one of the most important tools for a mathematician: to discard the bad ideas one got on the sofa (one other important tool to spawn ideas). However, I think it is a bad idea to discard (all) bad ideas. It would make life easier (in the math world especially) if bad ideas was documented as tried, “don’t go there, you can’t prove that connection between those objects” ideas.

Definitions of the words used here aside — and self-reflexions too — , where I’m heading with this rambling is that I will not, in this post, copy madsens first post from a few years back and not rant about what i think of all that web2.0 bollo^H^H^H^H^Hstuff either. Instead I’m looking forward to share lots of bad ideas — most likely a combination of electronics, bicycles and computer music software — with the nothingness that fills the cyber-net. I shall of cause be pleased by receiving any PONG to my PING’s — it’s not that.

Big thanks to madsen to interface me with the $WORLD.